What should a paralegal do if their research leads primarily to cases with limited authority?

When a paralegal's research results primarily in cases with limited authority, the most prudent course of action is to seek counsel from a supervising attorney. This approach is beneficial because it involves gaining insights from someone with more legal experience who can provide guidance on how to proceed. The supervising attorney can help determine the relevance and applicability of the findings and may suggest additional avenues of research or alternative legal strategies that the paralegal might not have considered. This collaboration ensures that the research is solidified with appropriate legal backing and increases the chances of supporting the case effectively.

Engaging with a supervising attorney also helps in developing the paralegal’s research skills and understanding of legal nuances, enabling them to approach subsequent research tasks with greater insight and direction. Such communication reinforces teamwork within the legal environment and ensures that all research is aligned with the broader legal strategy employed by the firm.

In contrast, concluding the research prematurely, changing strategies without proper evaluation, or continuing without direction could lead to misinformed decision-making, inefficient use of resources, and potentially jeopardizing a case due to incomplete or inadequate legal grounding.