What is a recommended practice after identifying relevant statutes?

After identifying relevant statutes, consulting secondary sources for context is a recommended practice because it helps enhance understanding of the law and its application. Secondary sources, which include legal commentary, law review articles, treatises, and practice guides, provide insight into how statutes are interpreted, their legislative history, and practical implications. They can clarify complex legal language, present various interpretations of the statutes, and offer guidance on how courts have applied them in practice.

Using secondary sources is particularly important for understanding the nuances and broader context around statutes. They can give researchers essential background information, highlight important cases that interpret the statute, and offer analysis that can guide decisions or strategies in legal practice. This step is crucial for building a well-rounded understanding of the legal framework you are dealing with, especially when preparing legal arguments or advising clients.

In contrast, discussing findings only with peers might not provide the depth of legal analysis needed, ignoring regulatory implications would lead to a lack of awareness of important compliance issues, and limiting research to primary sources might lead to a narrow understanding without the context that secondary sources provide.