What happens if the text of a statute and its annotations conflict?

When there is a conflict between the text of a statute and its annotations, the text of the statute is given precedence. This is based on the principle that the language chosen by the legislature when drafting the statute reflects the law intended to be enacted. Annotations provide commentary, interpretations, or references to case law and may illustrate how the statute has been applied or understood over time, but they do not hold the same authoritative weight as the statute itself. Therefore, in legal matters, when faced with conflicting information, the actual text of the statute must be followed as it outlines the law's requirements and prohibitions.

In contrast, annotations may contain useful context or clarifications, but they are not legally binding, and their interpretations can vary. Thus, while annotations can be informative, they cannot override the statutory text, which carries the full force of law. This principle upholds the integrity of statutory law and ensures that the application of law is based on direct legislative intent rather than external interpretations or opinions.