In the case of a conflict between a statute and a supreme court decision, which would control?

In legal matters, when there is a conflict between a statute and a Supreme Court decision, the statute typically holds more weight as it represents the will of the legislature. Supreme Court decisions interpret statutes and set legal precedents but do not create laws themselves. Therefore, when the legislature enacts a statute, it is considered law unless it is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalidated by the courts.

If the Supreme Court has ruled on the constitutionality of a statute, that decision will inform how the statute is applied. However, if there is a direct conflict without a Supreme Court ruling declaring the statute unconstitutional, then the statute prevails since it is the expression of legislative intent and authority.

It's important to recognize that jurisdictional nuances could influence how laws are applied and interpreted. However, the fundamental principle is that statutes take precedence in this scenario unless they have been declared invalid.