In a research plan, should you start by reading court decisions relating to your client's issue?

Court decisions are a primary source of law and often provide important context and guidance on the legal issues at hand. Starting with court decisions can help clarify how judges have interpreted various laws or legal principles relevant to a client's specific situation. This reading helps in understanding judicial reasoning, potential arguments, and relevant precedents that may inform strategy and predictions about how a court may respond to a similar case.

Reading case law at the outset is essential for legal research because it allows a researcher to ground their understanding of the issue in actual legal outcomes, examine how similar cases have been treated, and uncover any emerging patterns in legal interpretation. This foundational knowledge can then guide further in-depth research into statutes, regulations, and secondary sources. In many situations, commencing with court decisions can provide the necessary framework for a comprehensive legal analysis and effective advocacy.

While it is important to consider various research methodologies and the specific needs of a case, starting with relevant court decisions commonly serves as a strong foundation for effective legal research.