If all the cases found during one hour of research fall under "Fair/Weak Authority," should you continue researching?

When assessing the quality of legal authority in research, "Fair/Weak Authority" indicates that the cases discovered are not robust or compelling enough to support a legal argument convincingly. In legal research, the strength of authority is critical, and focusing solely on weak authority could lead to inadequate legal arguments or conclusions.

Stopping the research after finding only fair or weak cases can be justified because continuing down that path may not yield stronger, more persuasive legal support. Instead, it may be more beneficial to refine the research strategy or explore different sources or jurisdictions to find stronger cases that provide valid support for the issue at hand. Recognizing when to halt research on insufficient authority is essential for effective legal analysis. Therefore, the decision to stop is based on the principle of focusing on high-quality and relevant legal authority to bolster an argument.