A state court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes involving claims based on which types of laws?

A state court has broad jurisdiction to resolve disputes involving claims based on various types of laws. This includes state statutes, federal statutes, and common law claims.

State statutes pertain to laws enacted by the state's legislative body, and state courts frequently handle cases involving violations of these statutes, such as criminal cases, family law disputes, and contract disputes.

Federal statutes, while primarily under the jurisdiction of federal courts, can also be addressed in state courts under certain circumstances, particularly if there is no exclusive federal jurisdiction or if the state law provides a basis for the dispute that relates to federal law.

Common law, which evolves from judicial decisions and precedents, also falls under the purview of state courts. State courts interpret and apply common law principles, which can encompass a wide range of issues, including torts and property disputes.

Thus, state courts have the capacity to hear cases arising from all three categories of law, reflecting their integral role in the judicial system.